Comparison of three methods of DNA extraction from peripheral blood mononuclear cells and lung fragments of equines.

EM Santos, JF Paula, PM Motta… - Genetics and …, 2010 - europepmc.org
EM Santos, JF Paula, PM Motta, MB Heinemann, RC Leite, JP Haddad, HL Del Puerto…
Genetics and molecular research: GMR, 2010europepmc.org
We compared three different protocols for DNA extraction from horse peripheral blood
mononuclear cells (PBMC) and lung fragments, determining average final DNA
concentration, purity, percentage of PCR amplification using beta-actin, and cost. Thirty-four
samples from PBMC, and 33 samples from lung fragments were submitted to DNA extraction
by three different protocols. Protocol A consisted of a phenol-chloroform and isoamylic
alcohol extraction, Protocol B used alkaline extraction with NaOH, and Protocol C used the …
We compared three different protocols for DNA extraction from horse peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) and lung fragments, determining average final DNA concentration, purity, percentage of PCR amplification using beta-actin, and cost. Thirty-four samples from PBMC, and 33 samples from lung fragments were submitted to DNA extraction by three different protocols. Protocol A consisted of a phenol-chloroform and isoamylic alcohol extraction, Protocol B used alkaline extraction with NaOH, and Protocol C used the DNAzol ((R)) reagent kit. Protocol A was the best option for DNA extraction from lung fragments, producing high DNA concentrations, with high sensitivity in PCR amplification (100%), followed by Protocols C and B. On the other hand, for PBMC samples, Protocol B gave the highest sensitivity in PCR amplification (100%), followed by Protocols C and A. We conclude that Protocol A should be used for PCR diagnosis from lung fragment samples, while Protocol B should be used for PBMC.
europepmc.org