Early PREdiction of sepsis using leukocyte surface biomarkers: the ExPRES-sepsis cohort study

M Shankar-Hari, D Datta, J Wilson, V Assi… - Intensive care …, 2018 - Springer
M Shankar-Hari, D Datta, J Wilson, V Assi, J Stephen, CJ Weir, J Rennie, J Antonelli…
Intensive care medicine, 2018Springer
Purpose Reliable biomarkers for predicting subsequent sepsis among patients with
suspected acute infection are lacking. In patients presenting to emergency departments
(EDs) with suspected acute infection, we aimed to evaluate the reliability and discriminant
ability of 47 leukocyte biomarkers as predictors of sepsis (Sequential Organ Failure
Assessment score≥ 2 at 24 h and/or 72 h following ED presentation). Methods In a multi-
centre cohort study in four EDs and intensive care units (ICUs), we standardised flow …
Purpose
Reliable biomarkers for predicting subsequent sepsis among patients with suspected acute infection are lacking. In patients presenting to emergency departments (EDs) with suspected acute infection, we aimed to evaluate the reliability and discriminant ability of 47 leukocyte biomarkers as predictors of sepsis (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score ≥ 2 at 24 h and/or 72 h following ED presentation).
Methods
In a multi-centre cohort study in four EDs and intensive care units (ICUs), we standardised flow-cytometric leukocyte biomarker measurement and compared patients with suspected acute infection (cohort-1) with two comparator cohorts: ICU patients with established sepsis (cohort-2), and ED patients without infection or systemic inflammation but requiring hospitalization (cohort-3).
Results
Between January 2014 and February 2016, we recruited 272, 59 and 75 patients to cohorts 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Of 47 leukocyte biomarkers, 14 were non-reliable, and 17 did not discriminate between the three cohorts. Discriminant analyses for predicting sepsis within cohort-1 were undertaken for eight neutrophil (cluster of differentiation antigens (CD) CD15; CD24; CD35; CD64; CD312; CD11b; CD274; CD279), seven monocyte (CD35; CD64; CD312; CD11b; HLA-DR; CD274; CD279) and a CD8 T-lymphocyte biomarker (CD279). Individually, only higher neutrophil CD279 [OR 1.78 (95% CI 1.23–2.57); P = 0.002], higher monocyte CD279 [1.32 (1.03–1.70); P = 0.03], and lower monocyte HLA-DR [0.73 (0.55–0.97); P = 0.03] expression were associated with subsequent sepsis. With logistic regression the optimum biomarker combination was increased neutrophil CD24 and neutrophil CD279, and reduced monocyte HLA-DR expression, but no combination had clinically relevant predictive validity.
Conclusions
From a large panel of leukocyte biomarkers, immunosuppression biomarkers were associated with subsequent sepsis in ED patients with suspected acute infection.
Clinical trial registration
NCT02188992.
Springer